Interim Assistant Professor of Philosophy
Joliet Junior College, IL
The Vagueness
Argument for Unrestricted Composition
Thursday, March 17,
2016
3:30-4:30 pm
Ronk Lecture Hall
138 Schar, COE
138 Schar, COE
In
metaphysics, unrestricted composition is a position concerning how parts and
wholes are related to each other. On this view, composition occurs any time
there are disjoint parts and there are no “special conditions” in which this
composition takes place; if there are parts then necessarily there is a whole
that those parts compose. So, if there is a trout swimming in a river in
Alaska and a turkey walking the plains of South Dakota, then the truth of
unrestricted composition implies there is an object—a trout-turkey—that is composed of exactly those two parts. Despite
the initial feelings of “huh?” one might have towards such a view, the view
does have several attractive features. In particular, one attractive feature of
unrestricted composition is that it eliminates cases of ontic vagueness by
saying that borderline cases of composition are impossible. In this
presentation I will discuss a specific kind of vagueness argument for
unrestricted composition
Come join us for an intense and
enlightening philosophical discussion!
Bring your bodies, and your minds get in for free!
enlightening philosophical discussion!
Bring your bodies, and your minds get in for free!
Sponsored by the
Department of Philosophy, the AU Philosophy Club and phi sigma tau
No comments:
Post a Comment